Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Healthcare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Robin Healthcare

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

not yet notable-- does not meet NCORP.  DGG ( talk ) 00:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep leaning towards keep, as it seems to have enough independent and reliable coverage --Morpho achilles (talk) 06:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  02:12, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - Wikibusines spam. MER-C 17:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment it looks like spam, however among other medical companies here at AfD deeply focused on software medical services, I found it's the one that produces physical devices that are already in use. Further analysis would be helpful here. And yes, there are issues with the amount of availabe sources. For example this link: https://drlogy.com/hospitals/robin-healthcare-solutions-23392 fails to verify the fact of establishing the entity in 2015 in Berkeley, CA, the USA --2600:2B00:7E53:4300:70DC:432D:1078:93AC (talk) 07:11, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment NYT Article from nearly three years ago: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/02/technology/automatic-speech-transcription-ai.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.162.28.60 (talk) 22:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Agree, fails WP:NCORP - coverage is routine announcements, the bar for NCORP is higher, "These criteria, generally, follow the general notability guideline with a stronger emphasis on quality of the sources to prevent gaming of the rules by marketing and public relations professionals" best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:03, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the references meets the criteria for establishing notability as per NCORP, most references do not contain "Independent Content" as per WP:ORGIND.  HighKing++ 17:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.