Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Hood's Quest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Doesn't seem to have enough SIGCOV to warrant an article right now. Liz Read! Talk! 21:12, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Robin Hood's Quest

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:N, doesn't seem to receive significant coverage from independent reliable sources. OceanHok (talk) 17:48, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. OceanHok (talk) 17:48, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment The game has an unmentioned review from Igromania, so there could be more out there. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - game has reviews on various notable sources including IGN Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign) 18:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Uh, no. That's not an IGN review, just a directory page. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I will note that IGN hasn't written about it (or reviewed it). The IGN link is a database entry, with the only text there, what appears to be, the publishers blurb. certainly not SIGCOV that contributes to N. In fact, the only review from a (i.e. one with an article), that's currently in the article, is Jeuxvideo's.  Cakelot1  ☞&#xFE0F;  talk  18:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * It has a review from Jeuxvideo? It seems like a very short news post to me. The Igromania one is the only review I could track down from a reliable source.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:04, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I found this Igromania review, but that's it. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:59, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails GNG, was able to find a review from Absolute Games, the game could meet GNG if another review is found - I scoured Google and Archive.org and found nothing else. Waxworker (talk) 02:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Here's a link to the Strategy Informer review:, probably not a reliable source. --Mika1h (talk) 09:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep by reviews from Igromania, Absolute Games and Strategy Informer already mentioned in the discussion. Merko (talk) 21:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * It's unclear and probably doubtful that Strategy Informer is a reliable source. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete With only 2 reviews in RS that could be found, the game doesn't seem to possess the depth of coverage a notable game requires. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.