Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Hood: Return to Rottingham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-04-26 07:44Z

Robin Hood: Return to Rottingham

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

It is pretty clear this is just something someone made up. Google searches for this title only result in the Wikipedia article in question, as the supposed movie does not even have an IMDb entry. Furthermore, most of the text in this article is lifted word-for-word from the article for The Dukes of Hazzard: The Beginning. It's obvious that without outside verification, this is just some fantasy created by a user.CatraDhtem 18:24, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Bjelleklang -  talk  Bug Me  18:30, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax, although I wouldn't mind seeing Weird Al Yankovic as King Richard. It's interesting to see that references to this supposed film have made it into several other articles. EALacey 18:43, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sightly Delete might be true Munkee madness 18:54, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs to be sourced if it's true. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 22:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. The article would suggest that Mel Brooks would clear this project in the first place, and from what little I can ascertain from Brooks' career, for him to allow this sort of thing - let alone a movie that goes direct to video or tv - would be something he considers to be debasing to his reputation.  Mind you, that's just my own speculation - but Brooks seems like that kind of guy. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 20:14, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete-- The Phoenix Enforcer (Talk to me)  21:05, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.