Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Hood Ventures


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Robin Hood Ventures

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

None of the references meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability and anything I find is related either to an announcement or one of their investments or a mention-in-passing.  HighKing++ 15:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  HighKing++ 15:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  HighKing++ 15:38, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:14, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Searches find announcements and passing mentions of involvement in events (noting a distinct similarly-named firm in Australia), showing a company going about its business, but not the coverage of the firm itself needed to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 08:03, 10 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.