Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Hunter-Clarke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 15:51, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Robin Hunter-Clarke

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Apparently one of the youngest local councillor's in history, so I thought there was a genuine chance he might be notable even though he doesn't pass WP:POLITICIAN. However, a search of google and google news shows no significant coverage in independent reliable sources, so doesn't pass the general notability guideline. Jenks24 (talk) 11:28, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  —Jenks24 (talk) 11:31, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  —Jenks24 (talk) 11:31, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

I agree with what has been said, but he is one of Britain's youngest Councillors, and one of the youngest in Europe due to his age - 18 ! Therefore, is it not significant ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.144.247.185 (talk) 17:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - our usual outcomes is to delete the articles of councillors of all but the largest cities. Bearian (talk) 17:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — -- Cirt (talk) 19:28, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete unless third-party coverage is found. I'm not convinced being an 18-year-old councillor is that significant. Yes, it puts you on the young end of councillors, but with tens of thousands of council seats through the country there could still be many younger councillors out there. Anyway, my opinion is not important, it's whether this achievement has been written about - Google News seems to think it hasn't, so unless someone can find third-party coverage that GNews didn't pick up, it doesn't meet the notability guideline. In the event notability is proven, the article still needs a serious rewrite - at it stands this article is like his CV. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 21:29, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

There are a number of younger councillors on much larger council of note. There is no third party coverage at any level. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.120.232 (talk) 22:09, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete There are more credible Councillors out there. Skegness Town Council is more or less a party political parish Council with no real authority. It is clear that this page is little more than an election address for the elections mentioned in the article! Therefor it is not objective. They are deffeinatly more notable young Councillors as Mr. HC is clearly just one of many! — Preceding unsigned comment added by George Gerald (talk • contribs) 22:39, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete in the absence of reliable sources that show the claim (that he is one of Britain's youngest Councillors, and one of the youngest in Europe due to his age) is notable. - Pointillist (talk) 22:50, 9 June 2011 (UTC) ...and also, I should have said, verifiable - Pointillist (talk) 22:58, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Page is no more than a personal election address. No objectivity. No source material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.120.232 (talk) 22:54, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.