Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Wonsley Worlobah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Robin Wonsley Worlobah

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails notability. Being elected to a non-major office and just existing does not warrant notability — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marshens (talk • contribs) 18:22, 4 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:49, 11 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 23:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:32, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:32, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 January 4.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 18:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment we have quite a lot articles on Minneapolis Council members. Mccapra (talk) 19:48, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Comment, leaning Keep - As always, looks like this is down to WP:GNG. My attempt at satisfying WP:THREE to focus the discussion is:   So, two pretty good sources (one national, one regional), and a small smattering of passing mentions in the Star Tribune and other regional news sources. Overall, I would characterize the coverage as weak, so this might be WP:TOOSOON. Suriname0 (talk) 16:10, 19 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep Per MPR News, she is "Minneapolis' first Black Democratic Socialist on the City Council" (2021), and continues to receive coverage for her policy positions (MPR News, 2022) (Star Tribune, 2022) (Star Tribune Editorial Board, 2022), so the article can be expanded due to the sustained coverage supporting her WP:BASIC/WP:GNG notability. Beccaynr (talk) 00:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * In consideration of the MPR coverage, I've updated my vote to Keep. I'm not sure how meaningful the ongoing passing mentions of her policy positions are, but it does show evidence of ongoing sustained coverage. Suriname0 (talk) 03:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep The person is an elected official in a major U.S. city and is the subject of news media coverage, as opposed to being mentioned merely in passing. Minnemeeples (talk) 07:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.