Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin del Castillo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 07:49, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Robin del Castillo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Only claim to fame are nominations to an apparently minor UK music award Technopat (talk) 12:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Would it please be possible to lift the deletion message on this article until Sunday? as i need a bit of time to complete my researches on this artist and draft the information I would like to add on him? thank you for your understanding — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmourain (talk • contribs) 12:52, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

He was elected "Best Latin singer of the year 2010" in Sweden, and his song "She's the One" has been ranked on the top 10 in Colombia and Sweden during several months in 2010. His song "Ya No Puedo Amarte' and its video that was launched this month (January 2011) are being broadcasted on international radio and tv etc etc...I am about to add all this information on Robin Del Castillo's wikipedia article, which I believe all argue in favour of his claim to fame — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmourain (talk • contribs) 12:39, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Deletion debates run for 7 days; given that it's Thursday, you should have plenty of time. If you require more than that 7 days, the article can be userfied to a draft page in your userspace, where you can continue to refine it. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:22, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:18, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - passes WP:MUSICBIO on accoint of his international touring to United Kingdom, Sweden, Colombia etc. Bearian (talk) 01:35, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - agree with Bearian above. Bienfuxia (talk) 01:44, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems notable. --Monterey Bay (talk) 03:40, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:ITSNOTABLE is not a valid argument. Seeming notable is not the same as being notable in WP. LibStar (talk) 13:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete 2 gnews hits. Clearly fails WP:MUSICBIO had not received non trivial coverage of an international tour. LibStar (talk) 13:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - Even though Libstar has a point, I think that Bearian also has right when stating that he passes WP:MUSICBIO via his international touring. The tour points towards musical notability.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:MUSICBIO says you need coverage of the touring. This is lacking. LibStar (talk) 21:48, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Folks, we have here ourselves a problem with Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle -- we can find many reliable sources of the nurmerous places he's toured internationally but without a single mention of the word "tour" anywhere on the Internet, and we can see the "tour" on his website, but we can not find both on the same web page. This musical artist must be tunneling through the Earth like a neutrino.  Oh wait, maybe we can not get so stressed out about a musicial artist that we've never heard and forget about reading the rules too narrowly. Bearian (talk) 17:54, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO and according to you we need to relax criterion in order it to pass WP:MUSICBIO. Now that's stretching it. WP:IAR is a very weak argument I've seen for making it something notable when it does not clearly pass a notability criterion. It's a slippery slope that allows non notable subjects to get articles. LibStar (talk) 02:55, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.