Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin martin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty ☀ 07:26, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Robin martin
Delete this seeming hoax. Anon IP removed prod. Google returns no hits for "Robin Martin The Son Of God" and no on-topic hits for "Robin Martin" bible reinterpretation. lowercase 18:02, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

This topic may not return hits, as the subject is currently in publication processes for his book, which is awaiting release. therefore the documentation around the publication is yet to appear. the author of the book, and subject of this article is not universally recognizable, his notoriety stretches only locally, therefore he is not widely known yet, espescialy in terms of other coherent articles on him. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gooner85 (talk • contribs).
 * Comment The fact that he is not notable is a point in favor of deletion. lowercase  18:08, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete unverifiable and not notable at best, if in fact there's any truth to it at all. (Twenty-year-old has discovered ancient documentation that he's the descendant of the new Christ?) When/if his book is published, and when/if it achieves significant sales and attention, would be the time to recreate this article. Fan1967 18:47, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP is not for people who think they're gods NawlinWiki 20:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Not in namespace anyway. There's room for plenty of us in userspace ;-) - Fan1967 21:12, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * So also delete Augustus and Jesus Christ? Or userfy? --Lambiam Talk 21:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment. I hope this person is under the protection of the Priory of Sion. --Lambiam Talk 21:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.