Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robot Rage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  20:02, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Robot Rage
The article failed WP:PROD, with the explanation "fuck you,dont like it,dont read it". That said, it lacks evidence of importance, has a minimum of content, and will probably never improve. Deltabeignet 22:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN or hoax.  Slowmover 22:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I get over 100,000 GHits for "robot rage" game. In glancing through the results, it looks like they're relevant to this. Fan1967 23:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep.Give it some time,it barely started.It may grow into a good article,but it wont if you get rid of it quickly. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rodrigue (talk • contribs).
 * Robot Rage appears to be a Miniclip game, and appears to currently be the one of the site's top 10 (from 150ish) games. ["Robot Rage" game] pulls 344 unique Googles, although a third of these appear to crop up in linkspam pages promising pornography. -- Saberwyn 23:39, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable online game. --Ezeu 03:07, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ezeu Sandstein 06:30, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Slowmover.   Proto    ||    type    14:09, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ezeu. Stifle 20:28, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep anyone who has played the game knows it is an overwelmingly popular game,and anyway it is not an official policy for it to be very notable,so let it stay. —This unsigned comment is by 192.30.202.11 (talk • contribs).
 * Its not a 'set in stone' policy, but being above a certain level of widespread knowledge outside of the immediate community (which is longhand for notability) is why George W Bush will absolutely always have an article, and Saberwyn's cat will absolutely never have an article. -- Saberwyn 10:48, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. Mukadderat 18:54, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) 00:11, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - describes every popular MMORPG, or Merge with Miniclip, if in fact they actually own it. Dan, the CowMan 05:42, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's not a real MMORPG like World of WarCraft or EverQuest; it's just another non-notable flash game that happens to have an online component with user verification and persistent stats. --Cyde Weys 19:40, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.