Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robotc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Pretty close to being pure spam, anyhow. Courcelles (talk) 02:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Robotc

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article fails the general notability guideline. It has no independent, reliable sources. Sunfoo (talk) 20:41, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   08:26, 29 September 2015 (UTC) I don't know, it has applications, but it's almost word-for-word the promotional material and citing said. Maybe it should get a mention as a flavor of C, but I agree that the article, as it is, has to go. 71.121.161.138 (talk) 19:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:21, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now as this has existeds since March 2009 and if there's not much improvement, this can be restarted later as my searches also found nothing better. SwisterTwister   talk  06:52, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   15:22, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.