Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robotic engineer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete &mdash; Caknuck (talk) 22:44, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Robotic engineer

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete unsourced job description but useful in telling us that geeky 11 year olds will be robotics engineers. Carlossuarez46 06:51, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, then redirect to Robotics. AnteaterZot 09:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * There's an article to be written here, but this isn't it. Delete with well-sourced recreation encouraged. shoy  (words words) 13:55, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I tagged it for unsourced and was thinking seriously about listing it for AfD, but thought I'd wait.  But this nom shows me that I'm not alone in thinking that this isn't the article we want with this title.  There is an article to be had here, but this isn't it.  Corvus cornix 23:42, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per shoy; unsourced and badly written. Think outside the box 12:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. :-)  Stwalkerster  talk 21:34, 18 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.