Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robyn Anderson (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:34, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Robyn Anderson
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Person notable for only one event; the information summarized here should and can be summarized in the parent shooting articles. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 13:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * DeleteSend what information is useful to Columbine High School massacre (do not merge as that would leave a redirect behind). The article is a pretty clear violation of WP:BLP1E. RayAYang (talk) 00:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep To the contrary, this woman isn't a BLP1E: see how her name was attached to at least one proposed law. It's all related to the massacre, to be sure, but when there's enough wide-ranging coverage such as a bill in the state legislature, it's definitely not BLP1E.  If being known in connexion with a single incident were always a problem, we'd have to delete Jocelyne Couture-Nowak.  Nyttend (talk) 05:23, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Utterly non-notable except for relationship to a single event. I see no need for a stand alone article on this person. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.