Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robyn Maby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:46, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Robyn Maby

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY (did not see any women's teams listed there on a first glance. Hmmm.) Rogermx (talk) 22:49, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: Indeed you don't; with the exception of the Olympics (covered under a different standard), women's hockey has never generated the press coverage necessary to grant presumptive notability to every player competing ... or indeed, more's the pity, much coverage at all.   Ravenswing   00:41, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails NHOCKEY, no evidence the subject meets the GNG.   Ravenswing   00:41, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete –Article about completely non notable person. Fails specific SNG for lack of any verifiable achievement and fails GNG for lack of any sufficient coverage in reliable sources. –Ammarpad (talk) 05:20, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Completely non-notable person? She represents her country at a sport! I'm not voting keep though, after looking at NHOCKEY I was surprised that I couldn't find any critiera she clearly met. I've added some information and sources, but it's not enough. Boleyn (talk) 08:09, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * There's no provision for half-notable people in Wikipedia. If there's show it to me. It is binary: Either notable or not notable, period. What ever come in between is pedantic verbiage. And less I forget, this is not the comment that requires your split-second response, it is not even a question, nobody sought for response. It is the Unanswered questions that you decided to sweep under the carpet, that should have response. –Ammarpad (talk) 08:32, 18 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete; To address NHOCKEY, she played 10 minutes in the third tier of the World Championships in 2011. Clearly not a pass, and the aticle attempts to mislead the reader into believing she played in other world tournaments when she did not in fact make the team for any other year.  The sources listed do not pass GNG, and do not confirm the content of the article (plays for the national team, played in China).18abruce (talk) 16:07, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless additional references can be found to support WP:GNG. WP:NHOCKEY appears to be pretty irrelevant for top women's hockey players. Hmlarson (talk) 22:41, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to meet WP:GNG and subsequently also fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY. -DJSasso (talk) 14:49, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NHOCKEY. Flibirigit (talk) 01:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.