Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock Krusher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Redirect to C.O.P.S.. The "votes" below are quite divergent, making a clear determination of consensus difficult. However, I feel that a redirect meets the primary objection that their is insufficient notability for a separate article while allowing for a selective merge as determined by consensus at the target page. Eluchil404 (talk) 10:39, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Rock Krusher

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article needs deletion or merging to C.O.P.S. Dwanyewest (talk) 15:58, 15 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ( X! ·  talk )  · @192  · 03:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: this was not listed or created correctly, I've completed the nom and transcluded it. tedder (talk) 07:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect to cartoon. Per WP:FICT we should focus on what people have said about a show rather than summarizing the show itself. - 2/0 (cont.) 07:40, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete then redirect per 2/0. This article has no sources and consists of nothing but plot summary and trivia. Since there are no reliable sources we should not have an article on it. Reyk  YO!  12:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Article is well done, plenty of valid information to fill it. The suggested guidelines are not binding in any way.  Policies are all that matters.  Ignore all rules clearly states if a rule gets in the way of improving Wikipedia, you ignore it.  All guidelines were done by a small number of people, usually less than a handful at a time, without the rest of the Wikipedia noticing, and can't really be taken seriously.   D r e a m Focus  07:41, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 *   — per nom as unsourced, non-notable. it's wp:plot and wp:or. Jack Merridew 18:46, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * keep or merge to parent article which is only 12 kb long anyway. Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.