Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock band 3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  ark  // 09:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Rock band 3

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Future video game, fails WP:CRYSTAL. According to the IGN source given, it is "a title in early development." In this interview with the Senior Vice President of MTV Games published the other day, we read, "Nrama: With such an efficient platform for new content delivery, is there a POINT from a business standpoint for you guys to develop a full 'Rock Band 3' sequel? DeGooyer: You mean do we need to? Well the short answer is, as efficient as digital distribution is, there are still things that are much more efficiently delivered as a disc. In terms of major upgrades, I mean. That said, we haven't announce any formal plans for a sequel game... yet." This sounds far too indeterminate and hypothetical for an article. PROD contested without comment.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 22:00, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete right now it's just speculation, but a redirect to Rock_Band would be reasonable. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  22:43, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete sadly, Wikipedia is not a Crystal Ball.--Prodigy96 (talk) 22:46, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, but per Starblind a redirect to Rock Band#Future Games would be okay.--TrustMeTHROW! 23:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC) User has been blocked, refer to Sockpuppet_investigations/Trusted_Throw for details.
 * Comment: Currently, Rock Band doesn't say anything about Rock Band 3, presumably because there is nothing to say at this point.  So although redirecting there wouldn't be the worst outcome, it might cause confusion about the status of the project, which seems more hypothetical than the projects discussed there.  (Also, if I said to go ahead and redirect, then someone would come around to yell, "Ooh look! Bad faith nom! Speedy close! He doesn't really want it deleted!").   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 23:43, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:CRYSTAL. Joe Chill (talk) 23:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:13, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL.--Little Gordon 01:03, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - one source that is speculative at best is not a reliable source. Oppose Redirect as well as we don't want the impression to be that it's in development.  This is just something from the rumor mill.  When it is factual then the article can be recreated. --Teancum (talk) 15:01, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per Wp:CRYSTAL. (Whilst this game will be notable when it comes out, a rumour on a non notable website isn't enough.) DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) &#124; (talk to me) &#124; (What I've done)  16:21, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL.  JBsupreme  ( talk ) 20:33, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey guys. Check it out/ It's snowing!--Prodigy96 (talk) 21:18, 2 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. LotLE × talk  21:24, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete As also at wrong name. (Band is capitalized) A redirect is fine. --M ASEM (t) 02:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Rlendog (talk) 04:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.