Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock the Cosmos Tour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Ty  00:30, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Rock the Cosmos Tour

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable tour. Article consists only of a setlist and list of dates. Fails WP:NOTINHERITED Rwiggum  (Talk /Contrib ) 14:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Keep this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.135.61.242 (talk) 20:06, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  19:15, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid you'll have to be a bit more specific as to why, since AFDs are not decided by vote. You need to state why it should be kept according to Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Rwiggum  (Talk /Contrib ) 20:23, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, a non-notable tour that fails to satisfy the general notability guideline with significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources. Just an indiscriminate collection of fancruft.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 00:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: trivial coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 02:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Has anyone bothered to even look for sources? Is the Liverpool Echo not a reliable third-pary source? How about The New York Times? The fact is that there is plenty of coverage in reliable sources to be found, although, interestingly, many of them are in other languages. This tour is internationally notable! Can people start doing some actual research instead of just sheep voting? DHowell (talk) 05:36, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - not one of queen's notable tours, nothing exceptionally notable about it. A-Kartoffel (talk) 10:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * What do you believe is "one of queen's notable tours"? You've argued to delete every single one of them, even after I've pointed out reliable sources. And what policy or guideline requires things to be "exceptionally notable" rather than just notable? DHowell (talk) 14:07, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - the nominator disqualifies himself per WP:BEFORE and some of the cries for deletion are ridiculuous in their own right - especially the one above, posted even after dozens of sources have been provided. Hello? -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa Chord 2  21:58, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - No WP:MASTODONS. A-Kartoffel (talk) 09:14, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.