Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockhouse Partners


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:20, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Rockhouse Partners

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not appear notable. They have worked for an impressive client list, but notability is not inherited. The references are mostly either to their website or only mention the subject in passing. A Google search does not provide anything much better. Happy Squirrel (talk) 15:54, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Only assertion of notability is clients that they worked for, and being the recipient of a local "best place to work" award.  most of the references for the content come from the organizations site.
 * NOTE I speedy deleted this, and reversed it based on a discussion that started here
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: It looks like two ads merged together -- one text advertising "Rockhouse Partners" and one text probably taken from the E-tix site's "acquisitions" section on how great E-tix is! Advertising, and lacking notability. Hithladaeus (talk) 19:20, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability is not inherited from their clients. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now - This has actually gotten news coverage as shown here, here and here (only press releases) but nothing significant and notable so let's give them some more time. SwisterTwister   talk  00:46, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:CORP.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.