Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocori High School shooting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 19:51, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Rocori High School shooting

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of long-standing notability. Beerest355 Talk 20:09, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 7 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep There are enough articles on school shootings on Wikipedia, as well as multiple categories related to school shootings, to infer notability in them. They are not simple news events, but events that are well-remembered and revisited when the next one happens. Eauhomme (talk) 04:37, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Well yeah, some school shootings are notable, but is this one? Is there anything long-standing here? Beerest355 Talk 15:29, 12 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *poke* 03:11, 12 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. School shootings in and of themselves are not inherently notable. However, this particular shooting has received more than just local coverage. Most of it is local, true, but the case was covered in a few medical journals as well. There's just enough here to where I'd say that this could pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:41, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable school shooting. international/national coverage etc.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:16, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.