Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod Cook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Denelson83 07:29, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Rod Cook
Vanity and/or spam, see WP:AWNB. No vote. Alphax &tau;&epsilon;&chi; 12:35, 12 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete Hmmm, yes, agree with nom on both counts. Anville 12:40, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ambi 12:42, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete A Google search for "Rod Cook" martial arts comes up with nothing of great note see (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=lang_en&safe=off&q=%22Rod+Cook%22+martial+arts&btnG=Search) He allegedly invented Jung Sin Yuk-Do in 2005 and it doesn't seem to have set the world on fire. If necessary, it could be a direct to that article. Capitalistroadster 16:50, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  . Capitalistroadster 16:50, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable enough. - Dalbury (talk) 00:05, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Preaky 03:26, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity --Rogerd 03:16, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity/nn -- Ian &equiv; talk 04:32, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --Roisterer 04:41, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity/nn IanBailey 08:13, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity. *drew 16:49, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity. *drew 16:49, 16 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.