Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod L. Evans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was RESULT: Keep (non-admin closure). Notability proved, thanks for your contributions and additions to the article Boleyn (talk) 09:40, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Rod L. Evans

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability for 5 years; couldn't confirm notability Boleyn (talk) 18:54, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:40, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:40, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:40, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:40, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep #2 deletion spree. Unscintillating (talk) 04:39, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment Nominating a large number of articles - all of which have been tagged for notability for at least 5 years - does not meet speedy keep no. 2. Boleyn (talk) 09:04, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep appears to be notable as an author. Tho not a formal standard, some of his books are in over 600 libraries, a/c WorldCat. This needs further work to find reviews & other secondary sources, not an AfD--The nom says they have failed to confirm notability -- but where have they looked? An article being tagged for notability no matter how long, is not evidence of lack of notability, just evidence that nobody has looked at it.  DGG ( talk ) 04:39, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep – WP:N notable as an author. I've added three sources, which is just a small sampling of dozens of articles/reviews about his works. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 07:14, 22 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.