Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod Ponton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BD2412 T 04:45, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Rod Ponton

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable lawyer; WP:BLP1E for a pretty non-notable event. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 00:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 00:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 00:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - Article was made by an IP editor and moved to mainspace by an editor who has had multiple warnings by other users. Felt like that was worth mentioning, as it could indicate a sock. Wizzito (talk) 00:15, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not a sock of him. I edit from another IP adress. I'm still in fact not that adress, and I'm not lying.  I really don't think we should delete the article, other viral video stars have pages like Antoine Dodson. I belive he is in fact famous for that video.  I plead innocent, you can't create an account when your blocked, and I think he or she was blocked around the time I joined wikipedia, because I saw one of the block notices in that adresses talk page (the previous block of that ip). — Preceding unsigned comment added by BCuzwhynot (talk • contribs) 2021-05-24T01:54:40 (UTC)
 * You need to see the difference between a biography where we can write a whole bunch of verifiable information about an article subject's life and works and a biography where nothing about a person's life and works is publicly, reliably, and independently documented at all. The criteria for having a biography on Wikipedia are not Project:fame and importance.  They are whether the subject's life and works are properly documented in such depth, by good sources, that a biography can be written.  This is what notability is, the noting of something in depth by multiple sources with good reputations for fact checking and accuracy who are independent of the subject.  Uncle G (talk) 02:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete This is a mess of an article. Otherwise, per nom. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the nom. Pahiy (talk) 16:52, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - The only difficult issue here is that the draft just should not have been moved out of draftspace. With no sources, this absolutely should not be in mainspace, but no prejudice against creation in draftspace with sourcing. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 17:22, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Barely found anything about the "cat lawyer" aside from the Zoom incident, definitely an indication of WP:BLP1E. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 15:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.