Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod Vaughan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Rod Vaughan
NZ newscaster allegedly dogged by paedophilia scandals. Tagged as db-attack, but I thought it'd be reasonable to bring it here for a consensus, since it lists "references". Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 01:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Under condition of a complete rewrite. In this state it reeks with POV, even if it does have a few references. (|--   UlT i MuS  02:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions.   -- Grutness...wha?  03:40, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

This week the state broadcaster offered him the settlement, which he accepted." Capitalistroadster 04:48, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be still working in New Zealand, and I'm not seeing anything on this on the internet.--Limegreen 03:53, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless rewritten without unsubstantiated allegations. He is notable enough to warrant an article. The New Zealand Herald reported on 14 February 2004 "Television New Zealand has reached an out of court settlement with its former senior journalist Rod Vaughan. Vaughan, made redundant last September after the axing of current affairs programme Assignment, said he took a personal grievance case against TVNZ which remained unresolved after mediation.
 * Speedy delete as attack page.-gadfium 05:26, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above (will rescind if content can be verified; even then it needs to rewritten from a more balanced perspective). Heimstern Läufer 05:29, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. &mdash; Khoikhoi 08:23, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, attack page, can be recreated if reliable sources are put in and written in a neutral tone. --Ter e nce Ong (T 10:26, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.