Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodney Power Station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  03:11, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Rodney Power Station

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Proposed power project, was abandoned six years ago. Not notable as a particular environmental battle, or as an unusual project -- IdiotSavant (talk) 01:34, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Pahiy (talk) 04:48, 1 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article's subject has been covered by multiple reliable sources independent of the subject itself, and it thus meets WP:GNG. These sources include Radio New Zealand (1, 2), the New Zealand Herald (1, 2, 3), Stuff (1), and trade magazine Oil and Gas today (1). It also appears to have generated a New Zealand Supreme Court case involving Greenpeace. The sources make it seem notable, in line with WP:GNG, and I think that the supreme court case adds to the notability. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:34, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Any good size power station proposal will always generate a lot of media coverage. Thus it meets GNG.  Schwede 66  18:24, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as per others Nexus000 (talk) 11:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep content. Might consider a proposal to merge into another article, but outright deletion – no. Nurg (talk) 00:29, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep this would definitely be a good read, would suggest keeping this article. NZDF1985 (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2021 (NZST)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.