Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodney Scott (author)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 02:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Rodney Scott (author)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:GNG, there doesn't appear to be any independent coverage of the subject. Without a named chair position or the equivalent, and a GScholar h-index under 20, I don't see a compelling case for WP:NACADEMIC. signed,Rosguill talk 02:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 02:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 02:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable as an NZ public servant, does not seem notable as an academic.--IdiotSavant (talk) 01:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Looks far WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF for this 2014 PhD and associate professor, although the citation record is a reasonable start.  Appears to have one forthcoming book, so also too soon for WP:NAUTHOR.  No other sign of notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 13:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 11:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. his GS shows a promising start of a career but not yet enough for notability with an h-index of 13. --hroest 15:58, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete for now. Based on a quick look at this, there is a little more, but not enough I think.  TOOSOON I think.  Aoziwe (talk) 09:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.