Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodnik

Rodnik was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to keep the article.

Pure advertising copy. I couldn't find the source to copyvio it. --jpgordon{gab} 18:05, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * It seems to be an adequately rewritten pastiche of material from [] website, and therefore not a copyvio. Although I could not find any reference anywhere to "lux Russian wheat." [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 16:59, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Strip it of all advertizing so it's an article about the brand, unless there's really nothing left afterwards, in which case delete. -R. fiend 18:16, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Advertising. "I can really taste the suffering!"  Geogre 18:32, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Send to clean up, since it has been stripped and cleaned. Geogre 15:50, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. "15th century formula governed by the Tsars, including Catherine the Great." WTF??? Smerdis of Tlön 20:02, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Agree with R. fiend, its likely something can be written here. &mdash; siro  &chi;  o  20:51, Nov 11, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable. Advertising. For now I have performed a POV-ectomy on the original text as submitted. No evidence has been presented that it merits more than a line or two. The appropriate place for that line or two is Vodka. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 21:00, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Brewery established in 1895, and Google seems to turn up some results as a connoisseur's (sp?) vodka. Fix/cleanup/whatever, don't delete. zoney &#09827; talk 23:31, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Is it known as "Rodnik" or "Rodnik Vodka?" If it's to go to Clean Up, it needs a proper position. Geogre 20:54, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Indeed. But this is a vote to delete or not. I say don't delete. As an aside, I would imagine that Rodnik vodka is more helpful as a page location, but I can by no means offer a definitive position on that. zoney &#09827; talk 22:32, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, agree with Zoney. -- [[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 09:47, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.