Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodrigo Constanzo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 18:27, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Rodrigo Constanzo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

promotional article lacking coverage in independent reliable sources. no real claim of notability. old prod removed by SPA article creator Duffbeerforme (talk) 06:52, 21 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —  Jujutacular  T · C 08:09, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - it does make a claim of notability ("won several competitions") but given the competitions aren't named and from context appear to be non-notable, the claim of notability is not supported. Therefore delete for not passing WP:N (or WP:NMUSIC). - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:47, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment: I don't yet see what criterion of WP:BAND it meets, but am happy to hold off voting in the event that someone can demonstrate that.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator, no sources listed. WildHorsesPulled (talk) 23:46, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.