Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodrigo de la Cadena


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:24, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Rodrigo de la Cadena

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NMG. Cannot find any reliable sources significantly covering his work. I also feel like this an autobiography. I am thinking of nominating 2 of his works (can be seen in the discography section) for deletion. Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 19:54, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 19:54, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 19:54, 17 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - I found a number of articles in Spanish: El Sol de Mexico, El Universal, Amexpas, Tiempo de Boleros, Diario contraReplica - and these are just a few, there are more - (he even has a restaurant named after him, Rodrigo de la Cadena Cave) - I think there is enough non-trivial coverage to pass WP:MUSICBIO - the article was originaly nominated for speedy deletion (CSD a7) two hours after it was created in 2007, but the notice was removed the same day - Epinoia (talk) 02:19, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * thanks for the in put. If you don't mind me asking, what do you think of his two works in the discography section? Regards, Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 06:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * - they both look like candidates for Redirects to Rodrigo de la Cadena if the article is kept - if the article is deleted they are probably candidates for deletion - Epinoia (talk) 14:50, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the multiple reliable sources articles identified above so that WP:GNG is passed. Regarding his album articles they should be the subject of a WP:BEFORE and if no rs reviews can be found then redirecting would be the simplest option imv, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:35, 27 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.