Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roedy Green


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep AdamBiswanger1 03:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Roedy Green
Not notable per WP:BIO. The only references and claims of notability are on the subject's own website.--Konst.able 09:56, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep, as explained on talk page. --Piet Delport 10:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. -- Gray  Porpoise Phocoenidae, not Delphinidae 10:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep the article could be better, but i'm convinced the guy is notable. --Moe Aboulkheir 11:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, Roedy Green is a notable progammer and writer. J I P  | Talk 13:01, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Appears to be notable. P.B. Pilh  e  t  /  Talk  15:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Appears to be marginally notable in a few fields (Programming and LGBT rights activist). Article has potential to grow if his contributions can be expanded upon in these two fields.  A google search turns up a sizable number of entries, and just on the first page are SEVERAL biographies that could be used for sources, both of him as an LGBT Activist and as a programmer.  --Jayron32 17:30, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable -- Petri Krohn 18:09, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable. Hello32020 19:56, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It appears notable. Never Mystic (tc) 20:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm quite sure Roedy Green would prefer to be referred as "he". J I P  | Talk 09:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The article probably doesn't mind what you call it, either way. :) --Piet Delport 12:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh tsk, tsk. How could I have been so gender-biased? =P Never Mystic (tc) 21:48, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.