Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roflsnooker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 10:22, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Roflsnooker

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Conteted prod. Absolutely no references anywhere that I can find. Seems to fail WP:NFT. The Evil Spartan 00:44, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It is impossible to verify the contents of this article. A quick google search shows up no hits for this subject as well. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 01:58, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:V, Google turns up diddly squat. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 02:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - seems to be written as an advertisement ("new and exciting" "very popular" "it is widely believed") and is quite possibly a conflict of interest (WP:COI) given that 72% of the edits to the article are by a red-linked user named Roflsnooker. I concur with NFT violation. ALTON   .ıl  02:57, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Well, this joke, apparently made up in school one day, is definitely worthy of deletion. And, if that's not enough, the fact that the name of the "game" includes (R)oll (O)n the (F)loor (L)aughing is a good indication that this may be a hoax. — Travis  talk  03:06, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Voxpuppet 03:09, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - At best a protologism, but most probably a hoax. Askari Mark (Talk) 03:49, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - could be a hoax, breach of WP:V. -- Anonymous Dissident  Talk 07:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Hoax, per the fact there is "ROFL" in the title, no serious topic whould include that. Non notable if not a hoax.- Flubeca Talk 19:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, I'm surprised this doesn't fit a speedy criterion. --Eyrian 22:48, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. At the very best, this is just a 'game' invented by one person for use with his mates. The fact the article was created by username Roflsnooker does not help its case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tx17777 (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.