Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rogelio Mills


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:55, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Rogelio Mills

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Person is only notable for his lawsuit against Sean Combs, so I think this falls under WP:BLP1E wctaiwan (talk) 16:55, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Mills was known across the nation prior to interviewing Sean Combs. He has been the host of a nationally syndicated TV show for well over a decade. He has interviewed everyone from Jackie Chan to Michael Jackson to Jennifer Love Hewitt. He has been invited to cover numerous Hollywood movie premiers because he is well known and his show is respected in Hollywood. User:iam7 —Preceding undated comment added 04:51, 21 March 2011 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Comment. I'm skeptical that this person is as notable as the article makes him out to be. The article says, "The program has been consistently strong in the Nielsen ratings, even reaching number one in it’s time-slot." However, the source provided does not go beyond asserting that the show reached number one in its time slot in the Detroit area for a single week when it was airing late Sunday night (Monday morning) at 2 a.m. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:33, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - The article does cite a Troy Times newspaper article that discusses his program being broadcast across the nation. It's not likely so many celebrity guests would have appeared on his program if he was never notable. iam7 (talk) 3:33, 29 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - I give this article the benefit of a doubt concerning notability.--BabbaQ (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment It is no accident, to my mind, that BLP1E is on a separate page (WP:BLP) to WP:NTEMP (WP:Notability page); they are in many senses incompatible. A person who is once famous is always famous, says NTEMP, and 1E says if they were only once famous, they were never famous. The former seems more logical to me, but how can anyone vote on this issue, when the rules are not even clear? Anarchangel (talk) 16:33, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - NTEMP goes on to say, "In particular, if reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual." linking to BLP1E. Essentially, a person who is known for one event is not notable. They weren't notable then not notable. They were not notable. - SummerPhD (talk) 17:02, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but that does not answer my question. Anarchangel (talk) 17:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * You seem to be saying that the two are in conflict. They are not. If a person was notable, they always will be. If they were known for only one thing, they were never notable. No conflict. - SummerPhD (talk) 18:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.