Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger A. Weir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 02:32, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Roger A. Weir

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show that they meet WP:GNG. Seems to be a type of memorial.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. 19:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  20:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, WP:TNT, and WP:PROF. Sourcing and formatting are terrible. Bearian (talk) 02:52, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see anything in either the article content or sourcing that could meet any kind of notability criterion. It's almost a case for A7 speedy, but those are usually for much shorter articles. Here, there are paragraphs and paragraphs of...nothing. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:43, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT. WP:NAUTHOR is possible (though I didn't quickly find reviews), but there is essentially nothing useable in the long and unreferenced article. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 12:00, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.