Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Aspinall (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Waterloo Road characters. Second listing passed without a conflicting opinion. (per WP:RELIST) (non-admin closure) --Darkwind (talk) 22:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Roger Aspinall
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The first deletion discussion for this article was a massive group AfD which ended in no consensus because there were so many different articles being discussed, even though all editors participating in the discussion voted either "delete" or "merge". As the previous discussion made it clear that each of these articles should be considered individually, I am only introducing one article into this discussion. This Waterloo Road character certainly fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for fictional characters. Neelix (talk) 19:00, 4 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:36, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 21:20, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge, into a suitable combination article,  not just a name on a list. A fairly major character for the entire second season.      DGG ( talk ) 21:47, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ℳøℕø 01:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to List of Waterloo Road characters. I agree with the nom that this character is not sufficiently notable for a standalone article; he is better treated with a paragraph or two in the list.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 23:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.