Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Federer Grand Slam statistics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Roger Federer Grand Slam statistics

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is a copy-pasted fork of Roger Federer career statistics. I don't know if there's some consensus on whether this type of forking is appropriate, but it seems excessive. The information's duplicated in the career stats article, and I don't think that article's suffering from size problems, especially given how well it's organized. I worry about the idea of split off stats for every tournament. Shadowjams (talk) 20:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - two separate articles for Roger Federer's career stats? That's unneccessary.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  21:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I created the new article for the statistics because the original one was way too large. So the idea was to split it, i.e. the statistics of the Grand Slams on one side and then the others. It sill needs a lot of work, but is a start. The table of all the matches of Federer in Grand Slams is too big to be included in the original statistics article. That is why I removed it from that article to create a new one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanguito Wiki (talk • contribs) 21:08, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - I would assume that this article was created on account of the stats page being 124kb - and thus the edit page says that we're to consider splitting it into sub-pages due to Wp:SIZE (which is just a guideline and not a policy). DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) &#124; (talk to me) &#124; (What I've done)  22:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I acknowledge that it's a large stat page, and that's obviously the motivation, but the kb size metric is misleading since there's a lot of markup on that page. In terms of finding the relevant information it's a lot more convenient to use the TOC at the top and have all of the information in one place. Otherwise I think the natural conclusion on this page is to split every major tournament out to its own, at which point it's well beyond FORK guidelines. But like I said, I'm not sure on consensus, so I brought it here. Shadowjams (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:36, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete as per Eagles247 noisy   jinx  huh? 02:21, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.