Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Gold (music executive)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Roger Gold (music executive)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only passing mentions aside from one Billboard article. This article is unlikely to grow out of the stubby condition it has been in since its 2016 creation. Gold has done nothing particularly noteworthy and is just another manager. NØ 19:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:29, 21 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Not enough coverage outside of Billboard, does not have much notable sources.--Proudpakistani11 (talk) 00:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The voting is 2 to 0 in favor of deleting this article, any conclusion?Proudpakistani11 (talk) 20:32, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * AfD discussions generally last for at least 7 days. MarginalCost (talk) 22:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - As nominator points out, only one reference even comes close to significant coverage - and it's not even clear to me whether Billboard.biz has editorial review to the same extent their print edition does. I'd be inclined to give the benefit of the doubt, but I just can't find anything else out there to satisfy the multiple sources part of the GNG anyway. MarginalCost (talk) 22:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete since subject fails WP:NCREATIVE. -The Gnome (talk) 10:30, 28 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.