Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Haywood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 15:57, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Roger Haywood

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Spammy article about a marketing and PR guru. No reliable sources, heavily promotional content. The article claims that "As the world’s first issues analyst, he is regularly quoted in the media" but there are zero news hits on Google. Relatively few other hits on Google, either. Fails WP:SPAM, WP:RS andy (talk) 15:42, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Little or no reliable, independent coverage that I can see.
 * And watch out, same editor (Seb1990 contribs) has tried to spammify a related article and seems poised to try again -- see (and please watchlist) Talk:Issue_management and User:Seb1990/issues_management.
 * Actually, I'm not sure Issue management is notable anyway, but I'll leave that to others. Oh... just noticed there's an incipient editwar brewing too, now that another SPA has joined in:.
 * EEng (talk) 16:16, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * DELETE non-notable.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 21:21, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can confirm that he is quoted in the press. But that doesn't establish notability.  The most substantial coverage I could find was this very short bit. -- Whpq (talk) 16:34, 12 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG.Stuartyeates (talk) 02:49, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable person. I couldn't find any reliable source covering him in any substantial manner. --Odie5533 (talk) 13:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.