Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Ingraham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. ✗ plicit  00:41, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Roger Ingraham

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:FILMMAKER and WP:GNG. All I can find is an interview. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page because it has no reviews to speak of:


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete both neither have enough indepdent sources to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:05, 4 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.