Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger James Hamilton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 10:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Roger James Hamilton

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence of notability; loads of self-published and non-RS. zero hits in Google news archives. Jimbo Wales (talk) 09:43, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article Wealth Dynamics should probably share the same fate as Roger James Hamilton.  Either there is enough notable content to merge the two articles (with removal of all the self-promotion), or they should both be deleted.  Peacock (talk) 09:53, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Wealth Dynamics if sufficient sources for that can be found, delete both otherwise. Notability claim seems to be derived from there. —Kusma (t·c) 10:00, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 10:59, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 10:59, 1 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete I googled his name and found nothing but hundreds of puff links. Nothing in Forbes, WSJ, etc. where I would expect to find business-related coverage. Same for googling Wealth Dynamics. XL Group is now a different company. Couldn't find him in Worldcat ID either. Can't see any notability due to lack of trustworthy third-party coverage. 75.60.17.100 (talk) 16:11, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, per Jimbo. Pure puffery. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:27, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. One of the editors working on the article left this message on Jimbo's talk page just before this AfD. Wnt (talk) 18:00, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I couldn't find anything substantial at all on Google News, Books, Scholar, Finance, or through a general web search. A lot of PR stuff, but nothing really independent that had any real detail. Wealth Dynamics will probably also need to be deleted, I couldn't find anything for that either. Silver  seren C 21:00, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete This article Possible merge of Wealth Dynamics to List of Ponzi schemes It appears that Wealth Dynamics has been investigated as a scam,, . Google search for wealth dynamics scam yields 3,110,000 results. Just a note for neutrality, I couldn't find anything about "Wealth dynamics" at http://www.scamwatch.gov.au  Ryan Vesey  Review me!  03:34, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete; I can understand why it would have been delicate for Jimbo to do so, but this would very much qualify for G11 speedy. &mdash; Coren (talk) 11:18, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete this article, per Ryan Vesey, and I too also suspect Wealth Dynamics is promotional moonshine as well. That article proposes a murky mixture of Taoism and personality profiling as the new way to Make Money Fast, so it really isn't surprising to find it being investigated as a Ponzi scheme.  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:36, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete And I really tried to find something notable. Collect (talk) 17:34, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.