Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Jurey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 02:56, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Roger Jurey
Nothing on Google. Hoax? -- Curps 22:51, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing on hotbot or altavista except ones that point back here -- Ruby  23:03, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:V. --Aaron 23:05, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Delete per Aaron. This appears to be a simple case of hoax. SteveJ2006 23:08, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete photo tag says it all "long forgotten" - as in a long-forgotten dream, ie never happened in the first place. hoax. Camillus (talk) 00:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - The image displayed on the page has a description of "The author was a photographer friend of my uncles who gave him this photo of the forgotten vaudeville star Roger Jurey.", Hoax. -- light darkness (talk) 01:56, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - http://www.freewebs.com/roger_jurey/index.htm IT'S SERIOUS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.4.232.240 (talk • contribs) 20:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - The picture used is of another person (http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~rosdavies/Daviesphotos/DaviesJTyoungface.JPG&imgrefurl=http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~rosdavies/DAVIES/LancsDaviesJT.htm&h=360&w=284&sz=12&tbnid=f4gvat4k8D99-M:&tbnh=117&tbnw=92&hl=en&start=21&prev=/images%3Fq%3D1920%2527s%2Byoung%2Bman%26start%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN) Kapphat 20:38, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Those links don't work. Ardric47 23:36, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Never mind, it was just the wiki formatting. should work better. Ardric47 23:40, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Also, how did you figure that out? Ardric47 02:47, 23 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Well that should settle it then. This person clearly did not exist. SteveJ2006 02:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as apparent hoax. Ardric47 02:31, 23 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.