Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Maloney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 06:56, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Roger Maloney
Cut and paste of bio from of non-notable bureaucrat from regional website by WikiRoo (talk • contribs) aka WikiDoo (talk • contribs) who has issues. This article isn't going anywhere good. JChap (Talk) 18:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Also, speediable as a copyvio. JChap (Talk) 20:45, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

WikiRooThe article was modified and updated to expand Wiki and is not cut and paste.


 * Delete -- copy-and-paste of non-notable subject with some POV added. See also Kent Gillespie added by the same user -- another straight copy-and-paste job of a non-notable subject. --Gary Will 18:48, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. CSD has been listed, although CSD A7 does apply, this may be a copyvio nonetheless if the website that it was copied from is copyrighted. Zos 19:05, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * It's a govt site, rather than a commercial one, and it doesn't assert copyright. That's why I brought it here.  There's an RfC on the editor, who's a conspiracy-pusher, here, if you're interested. JChap  (Talk) 19:29, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, it probably is a copyvio. See Crown copyright. JChap  (Talk) 20:45, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per copyvio. Fabricationary 19:46, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 *  Delete  as non-notable bureaucrat failing WP:BIO. -- H·G (words/works) 19:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Vote change: Speedy Delete, if this definitely is copyvio, it needs to go quickly. -- H·G (words/works) 22:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --  Wikipedical 19:52, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as copyvio. --DarkAudit 22:32, 15 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.