Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Menard

Roger Menard was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

The "technical mastermind" behind oreotrilogy (see above). -- Graham &#9786; | Talk 15:29, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I have speedily deleted this because User:Soldier43 has posted basically the same information to his user page and namespace to user redirects are discouraged. -- Graham &#9786; | Talk 20:07, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete or userfy. -- Antaeus Feldspar 16:46, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, we done need ether the website or the crator here. Fledgeling 18:46, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. But please don't dampen the enthusiasm of the contributor any more than absolutely necessary in the process. We were all new once. Andrewa 20:52, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, promo vanity. Welcome to wiki :) Wyss 21:43, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity. Jayjg 22:37, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Move to User:Soldier43 and delete. &#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; 05:25, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * I guess there isn't much else to say then to delete. Soldier43

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.