Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Mitchell (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Exemplo347 (talk) 08:45, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Roger Mitchell
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Disambiguation page for which only one of the entries has an actual article (Roger Michell), the rest linking to various other articles where "Roger Mitchell"s or "Roger Michell"s are mentioned. The page used to be an actual article (for the first entry) but it was merged away and the dab moved over it. ansh 666 07:19, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ansh 666  07:19, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. ansh 666  07:19, 27 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Valid dab page for several people each worth an entry. Pam  D  08:33, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * And have added E. Roger Mitchell. Pam  D  08:36, 27 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Several valid entries, with articles or meeting MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION. If someone types 'Roger Mitchell' into Wikipedia, they can see a list of people they might mean and articles with information on Roger Mitchells in them. Boleyn (talk) 11:47, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The thing is, none of the articles have any information on any Roger Mitchell. They're all just redlinked entries in a table or a list with no further explanation. ansh 666 22:15, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * They all have bluelinks on the line which go to articles which mention Roger Mitchells and, e.g. show you when the MP Roger Mitchell represented that constituency, who he served alongside and who his immediate predecessors and successors were. MOS:DABMENTION doesn't insist that the information is very detailed, just that we have information on them in that article. Boleyn (talk) 06:10, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   16:10, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. This dab page provides useful navigation assistance for searchers. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.