Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Sackey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 23:14, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Roger Sackey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Despite playing in a "professional league", there is a lack of resources for this player both in English and Russian to state that this player might pass WP:GNG. HawkAussie (talk) 22:57, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 22:57, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 22:57, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 22:57, 27 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment he just re-signed for Great Olympics in Ghana, but their domestic league is in turmoil at the moment (not WP:SIGCOV, but there are about 20 articles like this and some appear to go into more coverage.) Lean delete, but with an eyebrow raised. SportingFlyer  T · C  23:38, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:09, 28 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - article about semi-professional footballer who may have played in a handful of matches in a fully-pro league, but the article comprehensively fails the GNG. I can only find transfer announcement (e.g., ) and database entries; nothing that approaches significant coverage. Jogurney (talk) 14:56, 30 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.