Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Stritmatter:Backup/Oxfordian Theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was closed. This isn't an article, and shouldn't be brought to AFD. One can take it to WP:MFD if they like, though there's probably little chance of deletion there. Wily D 19:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)  The closing admin was a fucking idiot, and I've gone ahead and deleted the article as A10. So, "closed" is still the correct outcome. Wily D 21:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Roger Stritmatter:Backup/Oxfordian Theory
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Duplicate of Oxfordian theory of Shakespeare authorship. ScienceApologist (talk) 16:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as A10. Duplicate article, nothing to merge, and not a plausible redirect. Tagged accordingly. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 17:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * This is not an article, and thus not a candidate for speedy deletion under A10, which only applies to article. Wily D  19:56, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.