Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Turner (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Shimeru (talk) 07:24, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Roger Turner (musician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

In my opinion this person is not notable per WP:ARTIST. bender235 (talk) 16:50, 23 March 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 10:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable free improviser, as can be seen from the copious article references and external links. AllyD (talk) 22:51, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jazz notified. AllyD (talk) 07:57, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Firstly, WP:ARTIST is the wrong guideline, I assume you mean WP:MUSICBIO? Turner clearly has been the subject of "multiple non-trivial published works" – in addition to the sources in the article there's an Allmusic biography and he also has a paragraph in the International Who's Who in Popular Music 2002 (ISBN 1857431618, page 514). That in addition to the multiple reliable sources already in the article should be enough to pass both the WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Jafeluv (talk) 09:53, 24 March 2010 (UTC)*
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.