Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger W. Stoller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (NAC) - It's about an hour early before a day but the consensus is enough to close for now. SwisterTwister  talk  22:58, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Roger W. Stoller

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Someone put their CV on Wikipedia again. Bradv 04:06, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:52, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:52, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:52, 14 April 2016 (UTC)



 References
 * Comment – News sources found thus far are local in nature, but it exists in two different states and provides significant coverage about the subject. North America1000 14:01, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ''Indiana Economic Digest
 * "Sculpture installed in Carlsbad roundabout". The Coast News.
 * ''InMenlo


 * Keep per - The article is somewhat promotional but it's not that bad and could easily be rewrote/amended to our standards, Plus sources above confirm his notability so not really seeing any reason to delete. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:37, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Page needs to be rewritten but seems notable enough. Meatsgains (talk) 02:32, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep There is just enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to satisfy WP:GNG. Mduvekot (talk) 14:07, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.