Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger William Harris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Roger William Harris

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Perhaps I'm having trouble with name variations, but I don't see reliable, secondary sources which provide coverage of this extraordinary pilot to evidence notability under WP:GNG. joe deckertalk to me 13:11, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 22:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 22:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Relatively junior officer. Worthy, certainly, but does not appear to be notable enough for a Wikipedia article. His Distinguished Flying Cross does not on its own make him notable enough. Thirteen awards of the Air Medal sounds like a lot until you realise that there are pilots out there with 20- or 30-odd such awards. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:53, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nomination, subject lacks "significant coverage" in WP:RS and is therefore likely non-notable under WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 04:05, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with above, more or an image gallery then an encyclopaedia entry. Jim Sweeney (talk) 07:30, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 19:57, 2 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete I had written a detailed rationale, but then I realized Necrothesp already covered everything I would have. The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい ) 16:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.