Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger garth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. PeaceNT (talk) 12:04, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Roger garth

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article asserts some notability of the subject but I can't find any reliable sources in order to verify any notability and so it fails WP:BIO. Couldn't find any links on google unrelated to wikipedia, and there's no entry for him on the Internet Movie Database. Wondered if his name was a misspelling but it's the same on his official site. Beloved Freak  01:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * keeep Asserts notablity. Article is new, and definately needs to be sourced, cleaned up, etc.  Id rather keep and tag.LessThanClippers (talk) 01:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - but how can we verify notability without reliable sources? I have looked for some but can't find any. -- Beloved Freak  02:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions.   -- --  pb30 < talk > 02:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. And..., honestly, none of the assertions in this article check out. For example, if the subject did co-present or appear with Heather Locklear on Saturday Night Live in 2006, it would have been most certainly be reported in various entertainment news websites; this is definitely a case where Gooogle hits matter and there aren't any. There are obvious factual errors: #41 in VH1's Top 100 Greatest Teen Stars is Jennie Garth. This does seem like a hoax. Although there are a few mentions off-wiki, none are in what could be called reliable sources and are questionable, to say the least.  FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 02:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Flowerpotman. No reliable sources, just a Myspace page and an "official" site which is under construction and has zero content. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, no reliable sources. The fact that he doesn't even have an IMDB page would strongly indicate to me that he's not notable.  Lankiveil (talk) 05:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC).
 * Delete as not verifiable and not notable. --Lockley (talk) 07:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.