Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger granet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. --Akhilleus (talk) 16:57, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Roger Granet

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Vanity page, self-inserted by User:Jbederman, a User with no other edits Wetman 00:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing in here qualifies as a valid assertion of notability.  Someguy1221 21:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.   -- David Eppstein 05:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep -- each of his books has independent reviews, and several have multiple. To be notable, "self-help" authors need to have a higher level of outside interest in their books than more specialized authors, but the books I searched for definitely make this mark.  (Needs definite cleanup) -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 15:28, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as above (agree about cleanup too). JJL 17:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per User:MscuthbertTaprobanus 17:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and let's all be a little more careful with the "v" word, I'm seeing it tossed around a lot.  Capmango 16:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps there is a good reason that the "v" word is tossed around too frequently. IMHO, WP:Auto needs to be made far more stringent.  Anyway, this article certainly sounds autobiographical to me. -- R andom H umanoid ( &rArr; ) 20:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with calling things COI or AUTO (though why we keep doing that in AfD when it's not relevant to deletion I dunno), but using the word Vanity is a direct attack on the author's character and strikes me as completely inappropriate. We should not assume the worst about people. Capmango 16:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete I am familiar with the world he moves in and his credentials are quite typical. I see nothing that makes him stand out.  Contrast him with someone such as Otto_Kernberg or (the poorly written article about) Roy_Schafer.  -- R andom H umanoid ( &rArr; ) 20:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, WP:AUTO not sufficient grounds to nominate. Subject looks reasonably notable and sources were provided. John Vandenberg 06:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.