Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rogers Bank


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rogers Communications. Since content was merged, page history must be kept to preserve attribution. czar 00:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Rogers Bank

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NORG and WP:Notability, and following similar nominations from Piotrus, this small bank subsidiary may not be notable given the relatively small single product, credit card, portfolio this banking subsidiary offers. Even if it's notable, with few substantive edits and only 2-3 sentences, this could easily be merged with Rogers Communications as a separate section (if it isn't already). Not every Canadian bank needs its own article until such time as one or more users want to fully develop an article. As such, this article seems to be either a permastub or an emerging permastub. Doug Mehus (talk) 19:48, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:05, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:05, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:05, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 21:31, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halkett99 (talk • contribs) 04:42, 16 October 2019 (UTC)  Striking per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. Mz7 (talk) 04:07, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * , But there's absolutely no added value in that delete...this article never should've been created in the first place since it lacks notability. It's also already mentioned in Rogers Communications, as far as I recall. Can I please convince you to change your vote? Thanks. Just looking to get this deleted and would appreciate a clean deletion. Thanks. Doug Mehus (talk) 05:25, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * delete agreed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halkett99 (talk • contribs) 05:51, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks. I've updated the Rogers Communications article with the two- or three-sentences from Rogers Bank.Doug Mehus (talk) 05:57, 16 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Rogers Communications (or "merge" may be descriptive) because the discussion so far covers the fact this topic should be and/or is now covered in the redirect target article. --Doncram (talk) 18:15, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * , Yeah, "merge" isn't exactly needed considering I'd already migrated the sentence or two into that section of Rogers Communications. I was hoping to do away without keeping the Rogers Bank redirect, but, on the other hand, someone could just well re-create it as a redirect. So, I wouldn't be opposed to a redirect, either. Besides, that shortened tag, properly redirecting to Rogers Communications would actually be helpful for those wishing to tag the non-notable banking subsidiary in related articles.


 * Merge/redirect to Rogers Communications, where the subject is covered, in lieu of deletion. It is useful to direct readers looking for more information about Rogers Bank to where it is covered. Cunard (talk) 23:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.