Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roheen Berry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Roheen Berry

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A discussion will commence below to ascertain if the individual is notable enough or not for a wikipedia article.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2021 June 5.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 00:19, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:47, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment a rejected draft exists here Draft:Roheen Berry. I rejected it on 20 May and this one created on 30 May. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:47, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I created this article and also listed it for a deletion discussion to get more opinions on the topic. The previous draft was also written by myself. While I do not need to submit for article for creation, I like too. However, I have noticed inconsistency in the approvals for the article for creation process and that depending of the whim of just one reviewer it may pass or be rejected. Perhaps, it may be worthwhile removing rejection all together from AfC process, and only having advisory, until it is ready to be approved, or has better chance and time of finding an editor who may approve it. Specifically here, I believe the subject is notable, as he is CEO of Wiesmann a notable German car company, that should suffice. There are also references to Forbes, and other publications cited.  --Death Star Central (talk) 14:15, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of notability whatsoever. Passing mention in some of the news about the business not about the subject. Some citations included don't even mention the subject. Notability is not inherited. RationalPuff (talk) 09:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I would like to disagree with the above comment, which I believe is not fully factual, if I understand it correctly. There is a feature interview with the subject of the article too here. Also how is the article about inherited notability? None of the subject's predecessors have a wikipedia article. So I don't see any relevance to that statement in this case. Besides there are many articles on wikipedia based solely on notability like this 17 year old Alexandre Grimaldi-Coste. Once again, there is so much inconsistency on wikipedia on this point I find, so I don't know if deleting and refusing is the correct and fair policy strategy in general for this, and the policy needs some review it self. But once again, I don't see how inherited notability applies. This article according to my perspective is about notability from a corporate acquisition and then the chief executive role of a notable German car company. Actually this could even be a one line article, like the article of the Aston Martin CEO Tobias Moers, with just a few lines and couple sources. I am happy for it to be cut down to that so that focus is just the role at Weismann, if the subject's family business seems to be an issue. I just thought better to include background here, so people who research the Weismann car company can be more aware of the ownership now. Which I believe is the purpose of wikipedia as the general audience would probably want to know more about that. But according to me this article would already be notable removing many of the references to the other business activities. It is the ownership and the role of CEO of a notable European car company, that are rather notable points evidently. --Death Star Central (talk) 17:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, as per RationalPuff. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:58, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:ANYBIO. Being a CEO of a company which may or may not return from bankruptcy does not confer notability. Ifnord (talk) 13:55, 20 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.